Last November, in Massachusetts, the ballot asked voters whether to change the state’s marijuana laws. Under the new law, anyone caught with an ounce or less of pot, instead of being arrested and charged with a crime, would simply get a $100 ticket. According to the official election returns, 63% of the voters thought this was a good idea. (Only 33% disapproved, with 4% abstaining.) This made Massachusetts the 12’th state to enact such a law, and this month, Question 2, the new marijuana law, went into effect. Already, police and drug prohibitionists are complaining about it.
Personally, I’m all for Question 2. Marijuana has never killed a single user, being one of the safest drugs ever discovered, much safer than alcohol. And in general, drug prohibition is a farce; alcohol prohibition was a farce in the 1920’s, and marijuana prohibition works no better. It is a policy born of fear, not of reason, and like all such laws, it wastes resources and creates crime, rather than making us safer. According to a 2008 report by Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron, Question 2 will save Massachusetts taxpayers approximately $29.5 million a year in law-enforcement costs alone. On top of all that, our nation’s drug laws are cruel and out of proportion, landing some non-violent drug offenders with longer prison sentences than violent crimes like assault and rape. Let me put it this way: I think cops should be chasing down rapists and murderers, not shaking down pot smokers.
Question 2 not only has a large majority of voters on its side, it also has informed reasoning behind it. This rare conjunction of popular opinion and sound thought should be applauded, not disparaged. But if you thought drug prohibitionists would simply take the informed will of the voters lying down, think again.
Their most vocal objection, which the press has fallen all over itself to report, is that no one seems to know how to enforce the new law. Police say they don’t know whether they’re allowed to demand a person identify himself, because they need to know his identity before they can issue a citation. Massachusetts state law, they say, prohibits the police from demanding identification for civil infractions.
“Not only do you not have to identify yourself,” said Berkshire County D.A. David Capeless, “but it would appear from a strict reading that people can get a citation, walk away, never pay a fine and have no repercussion.”
They also complain that their standard ticketing forms don’t have check-boxes for marijuana infractions. (Yeah, I know, stupid, but what can you do?) They wonder whether supporters of Question 2 knew about the problems ahead of time, whether the plan all along was effectively to legalize small quantities of marijuana. Right now, in some towns, the law is not being enforced at all, and pot smokers are simply being left alone (despite the drug prohibitionists’ panic over the coming of the end of the world).
And hey, that’s fine with me. But frankly, it also sounds like a threat. It sounds like they’re saying they’re going to let pot smokers off scott-free—and wouldn’t that be awful!—unless voters and legislators give in to their demands.
According to an email sent out by the Marijuana Policy Project, a small group of drug prohibitionists have quietly been lobbying the Massachusetts state legislature to “undermine the will of the electorate… Although opponents of Question 2 have claimed that the sky will fall in Massachusetts now that possessing an ounce or less of marijuana is punishable only by a $100 fine, they have so far been unable to invent a reason as to why sending these people to jail and saddling them with a damaging [criminal] record is a good idea.”
Meanwhile, some police departments are indeed issuing tickets, some cops are adopting innovative investigative methods in order to fill out the citation forms—How much does that cost? Is it really worth the $100?—and some local governments are piling on other fines for smoking pot in public.
But everywhere, police are complaining that they don’t understand the new law.
“It’s a very poorly written law,” said Holyoke Police Captain Arthur R. Monfette. “They should have sat down with police officers before they wrote the law.”
Bullshit!
Throughout the whole process, law enforcement and legislators have steadfastly refused to cooperate with proponents of decriminalization. If they had wanted to, the legislature could even have passed an alternative law, heading Question 2 off at the pass. But they probably never thought Question 2 would go anywhere. They probably thought that everyone is terrified of drugs and that they had to cater to the prohibitionists. They probably thought they could continue in their brutish ignorance forever. Maybe Question 2 was just the wake-up call they needed.
Well, here it is! Times are a-changing. Get on board, or be left behind. I don’t really care which, because I have little sympathy for whiners, idiots, and drug prohibitionists.
Always watching!
-TimK




Comments
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
All drugs should be legal!
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
The law makers in the country should be looking at places across the world to see how having legalized “safe” drugs like marijuana have an effect on their society and they would probably see that its not as bad as the effect of alcohol in society, or at the very least no worse than it.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Fuck da police
Not 'war on (some) drugs,' war on minorities
Drug war was meant to replace slave labor with prison labor; follow with me:
1865: civil war ends with north winning and promptly outlawing slavery
1866-1900: racist, corrupt politicians pass ’grandfather clauses’ (google the term if you’re unfamiliar, but I studied it in grade school)
1901: grandfather clauses struck down as unconstitutional for unfairly prohibiting newly freed slaves from actually voting
1904: California outlaws the operation of opium dens *by men of Asian descent.* Not just ’opium dens are outlawed,’ just ’men of Asian descent are forbidden to operate opium dens.’ Meaning white men could have made a fortune, except…smoking opium wasn’t what the white man did. The white man drank alcohol and smoked tobacco.
…
1937: after first denying the outlaw of cannabis (a.k.a. ’marihuana, devil weed with roots in hell!’) because he knew it would grow everywhere, and after years of secret research and cavorting, Harry Anslinger dupes congress into federally outlawing ’marihuana’ because it’s a vicious narcotic (it’s not) that produces in its users ’violence, insanity, and death.’
Read http://tinyurl.com/1mn and http://tinyurl.com/potconviction to learn more. Then order yourself a copy of ’The Marijuana Conviction’ from half.com (if you can afford it.) It was first published in 1974 and is the work of two UVa law professors.
PROHIBITION CAUSES CRIME, crime is not the direct cause of the drugs themselves but the black market FOR the drugs.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
I was extremely excited when I heard this legislation had passed. I lived in Missouri at the time and through the Marijuana Policy Project, (MPP.org) I sent in petitions to the “powers that be” in Mass. I may not live somewhere but that doesn’t stop me from doing everything in my power to help free my brothers and sisters.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
i agree
all drugs should be legal.
who the hell is the government to tell us what we can and can’t put into our bodies?
Its the fuckers in the bible belt and the conservative fucks that are afarid of this new wave counter culture.
if people want to shoot up, let them. if people want to blow a line, let them. if people wanna smoke a fatty after work, let them.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Did not George HW Bush survive an airplane ejection with a hemp parachute? Oh the irony.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
well thats just dumb. i thouroughly agree that marijuana should be legalized, but come on- all drugs?
thats just plain stupid.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Hah! Finally we score a point against ignorance and fear.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
“well thats just dumb. i thouroughly agree that marijuana should be legalized, but come on- all drugs?
thats just plain stupid.” —Anonymous
Oh? Just why do you think that legalization of all drugs is “stupid”?
Who are you to decide which drugs are “safe” and which are “harmful”?
Where do you draw your arbitrary line?
Why pot and not crack?
You’re making the same mistake that was made decades ago by the people whose greed and/or “morals” caused them to create the prohibition of certain drugs. The point is that no one has the right to tell people what they can or can’t do to themselves.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Who are you to decide which drugs are “safe” and which are “harmful”?
Are you out of your mind? No one decides which drugs are harmful, it’s just the facts: Which are that weed has never killed but all (Well known, AKA Cocaine, heroin and lcd etc) have. I agree to a point so that the money from these drugs go to a better cause than gangs but it’s just not right. The government have to protect us, fair enough they will get the drug any way but may as well make it as hard as possible to obtain to at least try to put people off.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Alcohol prohibition was stupid, because it funded gangsters, criminalized non-violent behavior (drinking), and didn’t stop people from drinking alcohol, but it did make alcohol more dangerous as users turned to bathtub gin.
Marijuana prohibition is stupid, because it also funds crime, criminalizes non-violent behavior (smoking), and doesn’t stop people from smoking marijuana[1], but it does potentially mean you could unwittingly get marijuana laced with something you didn’t want in your body.
Drug prohibition is just as stupid, because it funds gangs, criminalizes non-violent behavior (using), and doesn’t stop people from using drugs[2], but it does make the product less safe, because you might get a defective product or one laced with an unsafe substance, because black-markets are like governments: they don’t actually have to deliver on their promises.
Any law that criminalizes non-violent behavior without a direct victim, in order to satisfy the sensibilities and judgments of busybody voters and politicians, is stupid.
-TimK
[1] Between 1994 and 2004, marijuana use among high-school seniors, for example, increased by about 62%.
[2] Use of cocaine and Ecstasy has also risen among high-school seniors, because black-market drug dealers don’t check ID like above-board dealers do. And heroin is more than 600 times cheaper than it was in the 1970’s, before the War of Drugs.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
“Who are you to decide which drugs are “safe” and which are “harmful”?
Are you out of your mind? No one decides which drugs are harmful, it’s just the facts: Which are that weed has never killed but all (Well known, AKA Cocaine, heroin and lcd etc) have. I agree to a point so that the money from these drugs go to a better cause than gangs but it’s just not right. The government have to protect us, fair enough they will get the drug any way but may as well make it as hard as possible to obtain to at least try to put people off.”
I’m going to have to agree with the “All Drugs” point, but only because Every. Single. Drug. you can buy over the county right now has a higher mortality rate than cannabis. Even “regular ol’ aspirin” kills around 7600 (http://drugwarfacts.org/cms/?q=node/30) people per year, compared to a whopping ZERO for cannabis.
Some drugs do have a higher addiction rate or are much more harmful, but I think the decision should be on the user. One way that I see to start working on a “Compromise” with the anal-retentive prohibitionists is something along the lines of harsher penalties for drug-related or drug-influenced crimes (which should keep most cannabis users safe, since we don’t seem to go out of our heads for a fix). Also, the “penalties” should be more toward helping the user become a productive member of society, not another burden of the state (read: taxpayer, or US).
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
This article fails to realize that police spend the majority of their time and resources busting pot users. Of course this law is going to confuse them. The cop on the beat actually has to search for crime. What a novel concept.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
FUCK YEA Movement in the right direction!
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
LSD has only been directly responsible for the deaths of like 2 people.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
“Are you out of your mind? No one decides which drugs are harmful, it’s just the facts: Which are that weed has never killed but all (Well known, AKA Cocaine, heroin and lcd etc) have. I agree to a point so that the money from these drugs go to a better cause than gangs but it’s just not right. The government have to protect us, fair enough they will get the drug any way but may as well make it as hard as possible to obtain to at least try to put people off.”
First off, go out and try and find much documented cases of LSD (not lcd) deaths. In fact, maybe you should do like, maybe 3 minutes of research before you start throwing facts around.
And besides your point, it’s not the government’s job to create laws to protect us from ourselves. Laws should exist to protect our rights. Our current system treats heroin and other such drugs as a legal issue instead of the public health issue it really is. There are much better ways to handle drugs than in the court room. The drug war that is being fought to prevent the use of these drugs has utterly failed, and therefore prohibition fails. We need to figure out a better scheme to handle all drugs; whether or not you agree people should be using them is irrelevant.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
To say that marijuana never killed anyone is absurd!! It’s alot like alcohol, they get killed by getting behind the wheel and getting in a car accident.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
I moved outa mass at the wrong time. Now I want to move back because of this law, but the economy is in the tank. Oh wait you guys legalized the idiotic idea that gays could truly marry.. Maybe I’ll just move back by myself and leave my kids down South, where the pot laws are like 30 days for a roach. Un frickin real.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Yeah, because you hear that every day: “STONED KIDS KILL MINIVAN FULL OF ORPHANS.”
Dumbass.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
to all those people who say drugs should be banned based on the harm they cause, why are alcohol and cigarettes not banned? they not only cause direct physical harm, they incur an extremely large social, legal and economical cost. nicotine is as addictive, if not more addictive than, heroin and alcohol addiction can be so powerful that trying to quit cold turkey requires medical attention or it can be life-threatening. so, why should marijuana and crack and heroin be banned but not cigarettes or alcohol?
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
to all those people who say drugs should be banned based on the harm they cause, why are alcohol and cigarettes not banned? they not only cause direct physical harm, they incur an extremely large social, legal and economical cost. nicotine is as addictive, if not more addictive than, heroin and alcohol addiction can be so powerful that trying to quit cold turkey requires medical attention or it can be life-threatening. so, why should marijuana and crack and heroin be banned but not cigarettes or alcohol?
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
First I’d like to mention that there have been a lot of tests done showing that people who regularly smoke weed tend to be better drivers when they are driving stoned. Not out of their mind stoned but just chill stoned. Sure there are tests that say otherwise as well. I suppose you have to think about the tests and the prejudices behind those who created and ran them and decide for yourself which results are true.
In regards to whether or not all drugs should be legal, this is most likely a bad idea. Although people should have the right to do whatever they want to their bodies, they do not have the right to do whatever they want to others. Each drug causes people to interact differently with the world around them, and while one can generally be safe when just on weed, heavier drugs can make being safe a lot harder. And that’s not an opinion, it’s the way things are. If other drugs were legalised, there would probably be hordes of new laws written to regulate behavior and all sorts of other things surrounding the use of the drugs, and that’s not all that much better.
Anyway I think the real and most immediate issue is the emphasis most systems have on punishment and not rehabilitation. And that’s what should be focused on for the time being.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Are you serious? I’ve never tried lcd so I don’t know what that is, but if you meant LSD I’m pretty sure you can’t OD on it, or at least you won’t come close to it on anything considered a reasonable (or even unreasonable) recreational dose. The fact that it’s illegal and produced in a guerrilla chemistry lab means you have no idea of the concentration, which actually makes it easier to take a significantly larger dose than intended. I don’t think the government has to protect me from myself. How about rational education of the dangers without a smokescreen of bullshit from a D.A.R.E. cop about drugs as a deterrent, instead of getting a spanking from the government (and/or your cellmate) and a criminal record for hanging out somewhere safe or dancing at a concert while your head’s spun for a few hours?
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
“To say that marijuana never killed anyone is absurd!! It’s alot like alcohol, they get killed by getting behind the wheel and getting in a car accident.”
To say that marijuana killed someone is absurd!! You couldn’t smoke enough to overdose, unlike alcohol that you can drink enough of to die relatively easily. It’s dumbasses that try to drive when they are impaired that kill people.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Lazy, lazy cops. Only the most conservative of mental patients actually buy your failed reefer madness scare tactics. Use the people’s tax dollars for legitimate police investigations, stop undermining the will of the majority, and if you have lost sight of your duty to serve and protect the people, throw your badge in the trash, go home, and drink your legal scotch until your liver rots out.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
The “war” on drugs is a huge failure that targets our nations poor, fills our prisons with very low level criminals, and ruins a persons life with felony charges and can ruin their prospects for ever coming back from a mistake. This Nation, that has prided itself for so long on for individual freedom, sure does its level best on squeezing that right out.
As you will find from those of us that do not drink the corporate Kool-Aid, we have never run across a deranged crazy suspect high on marijuana. Meth, coke, PCP, and booze is another story. An officer that can look you in the eye and tell you they have is lying. You could argue until the cows come home about impairment, but even legal prescription drugs have caused people to be arrested for driving under the influence. If you are an idiot and going to go get behind the wheel intoxicated, or high on weed or prescription drugs, then you cross the line where you place others in danger, and therefore should be subject to arrest. But if you are sitting in your house smoking a fatty, who is the government to come in and tell you no?
There is no such thing as a gateway anything…there is such a thing as an addictive personality….look at alcohol. Some people take a drink, and work their way to where they can not go a day without it. It does not happen to everyone, just those that have some physical/mental issue with it that is best treated by counseling and medical professionals. This can also be applied to shopping, eating, and a myriad of other ills.
Believe in the live and let live philosophy. When your rights are infringed upon by someone else, then the law should be there to protect you. But if what you are doing is of no harm to anyone…you should not have to fear incarceration.
It really is time for America to wake up and focus on important things. For those of you so uptight about weed….go get yourself a joint and smoke it. Come on back and tell us if you still feel the same way.
BTW I am a retired Detective and there are a lot of us that feel this same way.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
thank you Nox.
well reasoned and well put.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Although i completely agree and find that there is a huge difference between any cannabis product and crack or heroin this doesn’t include lsd.
I would like to see your stats that included how and when someone died from it.
There was once someone caught smuggling lsd by taping the paper strips to his body and getting on a plane. He started to sweat absorbed 1-2000 hits and now thinks that he is an orange but is not dead.
I do not condone the use but do not think that this man made hallucinogen falls in the same category as crack or coke.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Legalization of crack, heroin, and all the “hard” drugs would be stupid…. but atleast all the stupid idiots taking them will die off. So yeah, go ahead, legalize all of them. Only the strong survive right?
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
The argument that “nobody should be able to tell us what we do to our bodies” is bullshit. Suicide is illegal, and thats something you do to yourself right?
Every drug should be legal? What?
You have to ask, if every heroine, crack, crystal meth…etc. were all legal, would society be better off?
I can firmly say “absolutely not”. Those drugs should never be legalized, and almost definetely never will be.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
What a well founded and informed argument you have just made.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Yes, that makes total fucking sense, sir. “Suicide is illegal” Yes, and just what are they going to do to someone who commits suicide, send their dead body to jail?
Also, you just countered “illegal drugs should become legal” with “Those drugs should never be legalized”. Good facts, dipshit.
I’ve never understood the suicide law anyway. If someone is depressed enough to kill themselves, do you think they’re going to turn around and say “I can’t do that because it’s illegal”?
Also, you missed the point somewhere with “The argument that ’nobody should be able to tell us what we do to our bodies’ is bullshit. Suicide is illegal, and thats something you do to yourself right?” You have obviously confused the definition of “should” with some other word.
See, obviously they can tell us what to do with our bodies. But the point of the argument is that “nobody should be able to tell us what we do to our bodies”. y’know, because of the whole “freedom” thing.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
I don’t see anything inherently wrong with pot. It doesn’t kill people, at all, ever. It’s perfectly natural and non-chemical. I personally don’t smoke pot, the smell of it makes me want to barf, but there’s no reason it should be illegal and all I have to say about this is, it’s about time!
Now, for those of you who think they all should be illegal—are you fucking kidding me??
Single, unemployed parents (or married, even) living in the ghetto off of welfare who starve their kids and steal from their “best friends” do crack, and are you telling me they should be enabled by legalizing crack? That we should just tell them oh, ok, nevermind, it’s ok, you can starve your kids and ignore them and throw them in ratty clothes and we just won’t do anything anymore to protect your kids. I mean seriously, I can see the logic in your arguments if it’s you and just you around, but I don’t see a reason at all why it ALL ought to be legalized; doing that is enabling and legalizing the neglect, abuse, and poverty the addicts’ kids will be living in, and for that sake alone it’s worth keeping the rest of the shit criminalized.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
yea its not like they can’t get the drugs anyways on any street corner in broad daylight. Yea its not like keeping it criminalized has got or deterred any bit any parent from using. So yea lets keep it criminal so we can keep the guns and gangs in their money and our streets unsafe. Cause yea lets think of the children who’s parents will get crack whether its legal or illegal, so we can keep the street corner gun toting thug in business…. yea lets think of the children who will grow up around the gun toting thug because we want to keep it illegal…. yup lets think of the children… lets think about decriminalizing it so the children don’t have to live next to the gun toting thug because their money supply from the parent of that kids will no longer be buying from them. And now we can more effectively teach that kid just like how we are waging an effective ad campaign against nicotine. And now we won’t trample our God given natural born without government born freedoms.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
um, its nothing like alcohol. It actually heightens your senses, I would guess that the average driver who drives high is a better driver. Smoking weed doesnt impare your judgement or reaction time. Anyone who has ever smoked and been in an “oh shit” situation knows that the adrenaline kicks in really fast and all of sudden your buzz is gone. It is one of the safest drugs out there.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Why not legalize it? Obviously it’s not going away why not tax it and use the profits to fund our failing education system and maybe warn of the dangers of drugs. We also import hemp, why should we be buying things from other countries when we can grow it here ourselves. These drug laws are ridiculous.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
“There was once someone caught smuggling lsd by taping the paper strips to his body and getting on a plane. He started to sweat absorbed 1-2000 hits and now thinks that he is an orange but is not dead.”
Hehehehehe… http://www.snopes.com/horrors/drugs/orange.asp This ain’t the ’60s, Anonymous.
Good article, TimK!
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
“I agree to a point so that the money from these drugs go to a better cause than gangs but it’s just not right. The government have to protect us, fair enough they will get the drug any way but may as well make it as hard as possible to obtain to at least try to put people off.”
Did you fall and bump and your head?? How does the dribble you wrote make any sort of logical sense whatsoever? The money the gangs gain from the sell of drugs makes them FAR MORE DANGEROUS than the drugs themselves. Because the drugs are illegal, because people still want them, and because there are people willing to risk jail time and death to deliver the goods, the profit margins are OUTRAGEOUS. This is exactly what makes the trade deadly, which in turn is what creates war zones in neighborhoods endangering everyone. This is exactly the reason Mexico is on the verge of civil collapse (and where do you think the refugees are headed??). The drug cartels are protecting their trade routes, warring for more trade routes, destroying politician’s, DA’s, and police families when they fail to comply.
When was the last time a Jack Daniels truck did a drive by near a Jose Cuervo neighborhood?
When was the last time a Budweiser delivery man put a cap in the Miller delivery man for encroaching on his shelf space?
Would you rather have wars over turf, thugs with no education and no morals banking $5k/week and be willing do anything to protect that? Or would you rather have a few OD’s a year from people who are going to test their limits?
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
“To say that marijuana never killed anyone is absurd!! It’s alot like alcohol, they get killed by getting behind the wheel and getting in a car accident.”
1. do research on the parallels between high driving and drunk driving
2. ppl who tested positive for thc after a car accident were also under the influence of alcohol (upwards of 50% fact check if you think it i am full of hot air)
3. even if a driver tested positive for thc and passed a breathtest for alcohol, it is impossible to tell if the thc in their system was active (aka within 4-6 hours after ingestion at the most conservative of standards). ergo a causal link between thc and car accidents is ambiguous by any statistical deduction is meaningless unless under control conditions.
DARE lies to use everyday. tobacco kills more ppl every year than pot (directly, casually) and yet they get subsidies from the govt
dont get me wrong ppl have a right to destroy their lungs, it your body
pot or cigerrettes, cigars hookah etc
pot laws do nothing for harm reduction
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
What freaking right does the government have to tell me what I can or can not do with MY body???? They could give a shit less about you until you break one of their fucking laws.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
one time i put a pot twig in my pee pee and got stoned as a bone
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
The War on Drugs has alot of Jobs tied up with it
Why not legalize pot? I’m high now so pro pot but anyways here’s why
Thousands of Legal related occupations are dependant on marijuana infractions for their livelihoods law, police etc etc….
if pot were legal potentially they would be out of jobs…
Who had big lobbying power with governments? Unions, Trades, Professions, etc… many of home are directly dependant on fighting maryjane for a living so they will always keep up the stance of negativity against weed in North America at least. Even if front line officers often turn a blind eye to is as they should, its just good business if you a police officers or lawyer etc to say weed is bad
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
An exhaustive search of the literature finds no credible reports of deaths induced by marijuana. The US Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) records instances of drug mentions in medical examiners’ reports, and though marijuana is mentioned, it is usually in combination with alcohol or other drugs. Marijuana alone has not been shown to cause an overdose death.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Comin’ straight out the underground
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Illegal drugs make sense in a country where there is no public health care. I would hate to be the one footing the bill for people that know drugs are dangerous then get themselves hospitalized up here in Canada. In the States its a different way and the drug user is responsible for footing the bill so why is it illegal?
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
“Legalization of crack, heroin, and all the “hard” drugs would be stupid…. but atleast all the stupid idiots taking them will die off. So yeah, go ahead, legalize all of them. Only the strong survive right?”
Interesting how in your world, everything that is legal finds its way into your body. You know, I hear they legalized bleach, guess we should all drink that now right?
Or were you talking about all the drug addicts that would suddenly die if their drug was legalized? (because we all know that legal alcohol is more dangerous and unpredictable than the bathtub moonshine of Prohibition)
In my world, people have something called “free will”. It might be a new concept to you, but it basically means that an individual is capable of making decisions for themselves.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
drugs = evil. exept mary jane
blueoo.com
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
you can’t honestly think that the legalization of all drugs is a smart decision. Yea marijuana should be legal it doesn’t harm anyone, but all drugs. Get real. How broken would this world become if cocaine and heroine amongst others were freely sold to anyone who wanted it. Thats just not smart.
Re: New Massachusetts Pot Law Has Cops in a Tizzy
Really? “LCD?
I’ve yet to read of any “Death by Televisions.”
But if you mean LSD, fact of the matter is that it is quite harmless. LSD is, in a simple explanation, derived from ergot, or a fungus on rye.
It’s effects may be strong, but it is not addictive and as long as you don’t drive anywhere, relatively safe. All the stories you have heard about it are just ignorant high schoolers spreading urban legends.
No one thinks that they are a glass of orange juice and that they will spill.
Post new comment