<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://abesturn.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Conscience of Abe’s Turn - Marc Garlasco - Comments</title>
 <link>http://abesturn.com/tags/marc-garlasco</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Marc Garlasco&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Human Rights Watch Military Analyst, a Nazi?!</title>
 <link>http://abesturn.com/2009/09/14/human-rights-watch-military-analyst-nazi#comment-8697</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Even if true, I think you&amp;#8217;re making my point for me, DB, that rather than addressing the substance of the report, you&amp;#8217;re taking the emotional shortcut—now painting Richard Silverstein with a broad brush. (That&amp;#8217;ll teach him to f*** with us!) So whether it was Omar Ceren or Avigdor Lieberman who originally came up with the idea, which one originally said it, and whether the other repeated it&amp;#8230; all pretty meaningless now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I trust HRW to be an objective reporter, in general, on human rights, because &lt;em&gt;human rights&lt;/em&gt; is their raison d&amp;#8217;être. I see no reason why they should care about Israel or the PLO or the US or any country or political organization above any other. Furthermore, I know that governments and quasi-governments &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; distort military reports to make themselves look better and their so-called enemies look worse. (And have done so for as long as governments have waged war.) And your spitting out a bunch of names and unsubstantiated accusations (without so much as a citation), that doesn&amp;#8217;t change my opinion. Nor should it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In any case, the point remains that the situation itself is way more complicated than that. Emotional frenzy shortcut.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-TimK&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S. The Omri Ceren piece is at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mererhetoric.com/archives/11275875.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.mererhetoric.com/archives/11275875.html&quot;&gt;http://www.mererhetoric.com/archives/11275875.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:22:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>TimK</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8697 at http://abesturn.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Human Rights Watch Military Analyst, a Nazi?!</title>
 <link>http://abesturn.com/2009/09/14/human-rights-watch-military-analyst-nazi#comment-8695</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Well, that will teach you to trust Richard Silverstein. As you can easily look up for yourself, the source of the story about Garlasco&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;hobby&amp;#8221; was blogger Omri Ceren at Mere Rhetoric, not the Israeli foreign ministry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Garlasco&amp;#8217;s Nazi obsession joins HRW Middle East director Sarah Leah Whitson&amp;#8217;s pre-HRW history of anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian activism, and deputy director Joe Stork&amp;#8217;s pre-HRW 20 year plus history of intense hostility to Israel, in raising the question as to why anyone should trust HRW to be an objective investigator of Israel&amp;#8217;s human rights practices.  Surely, an organization trying to be &amp;#8220;objective&amp;#8221; could find folks interested in human rights who have not taken public sides in the conflict and don&amp;#8217;t have creepy Nazi-related hobbies.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:48:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DB</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8695 at http://abesturn.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

